One point the book hits on is the notion of an interlocutor answering a question with another question. From the book:
S1: What does pragmatics mean?
S2: Do you have an hour or two?
S1: Complicated, huh? Just give me the short answer.
And this conversation involves two willing participants. Just think if S2 were irritated.
S1: What does pragmatics mean?
S2: You saying I don't know what pragmatics means?
S1: No, I'm just asking--
S2: You asking me to prove my knowledge to you?
S1: I just--
S2: You just want to make a fool out of me.
The stuff of a convincing character.
3 comments:
You want a piece of me?
The stuff of (seemingly) convincing politicians, too...
Renee: You think I can't hold my own in a fight?
Rob: The first thing politicians should learn is not to call a $700B bill a "bailout" and expect citizens to support it.
Post a Comment